I just read an article by Justin Heap from Relevant Leaders - he says that Bill Hybels, leader of Willow Creek, did an intensive study of their congregation based on their programs and philosophy and found that they have not taught their people how to be disciples, no surprise there if you ask me, anyhow Hybels has written a book about this called, Reveal:Where are You?, now I haven't read the book just the article. Anyhow my question is more about something in the article it says,
A few years ago, I had the privilege of being a part of a local community church in west Michigan and I believe they did, and are doing, a great job at giving people the stuff they "are crying out for." From my perspective, they had no problem in being seeker sensitive while carefully avoiding becoming consumed as seeker driven, as was/is the apparent philosophy behind Willow & many other like-minded churches. However, they pointed out that the question that needs answering the most in this philosophy is, "Are you willing to allow some people to walk away?" (Matthew 19.16-22). And this is exactly the opposite of the seeker-driven, and sometimes emergent, mindset.
That is to say we cannot fathom allowing someone to walk away. Often we sacrifice discipleship to obtain evangelism and fellowship. When in reality, discipleship includes both.
Something of new concern to me, and on the heels of said philosophy, is the attraction to the "fastest growing churches.” It scares me really. Not so much the specific church itself but the attraction of it all. Have we really become that obsessed with the American culture that we think fast, easy, and mega (referring to Spurlock’s Super Size Me) are appropriate words to describe growth? That's McDonalds deal! And have we already forgotten the words and images of Spurlock that this approach to life would leave us unhealthy, obese and immobile? Whatever happened to quality, depth and maturity?. . .
There is nothing particularly wrong about the larger churches, or any church for that matter, so long as they have not abandoned the way, or cost, of discipleship. What good does it do America to have millions of Christians if most of us remain babies for the entirety of our lives? We need to stand once again on the platform of Dietrich Bonhoeffer and C.S. Lewis; walk again the path blazed by Jesus of Nazareth. The path of following. It is a verb, not an event. Salvation is glorious and immediate—but it is also upward and ongoing.
I have never been interested in or really behind the whole seeker movement the whole Saddle Back Sam idea makes me sick to my stomach and I don't see the seeker movement and the emergent church as one in the same. I always saw the emergent church as a movement away from seeker churches to a more dischipleship model what do you think?